Evidence memo / Anabolic androgens & PEDs

RAD-140 (testolone)

Also: testolone · RAD140

A widely sold SARM with no completed efficacy trial in humans and multiple independent published case reports of drug-induced liver injury in people who took it.

Claim-specific / contestedSafety/regulatory watchSafety / regulatory watch

The verdict

Our read at a glance.

Whether a compound with no human efficacy trial and a growing published record of liver injury has any defensible use.

The signal
There is no completed human efficacy trial establishing what RAD-140 does to muscle mass or strength. What does exist in the peer-reviewed literature is harm: independent case reports of drug-induced liver injury in RAD-140 users, plus analyses characterizing SARM-associated liver injury as a class and comparing its presentation with anabolic-steroid liver injury.
The unknown
Its actual efficacy in humans, since no trial has measured it, and the true incidence of liver injury, since case reports capture only people who sought care and whose clinicians identified the cause. The denominator is unknown, which means the risk cannot be quantified, only demonstrated.
Our read
The clearest risk-without-evidence entry in the muscle category. Ostarine at least ran phase 3 trials and reported an honest miss. RAD-140 has no efficacy trial at all, and the human literature that does exist is a list of people whose livers were injured.

The mechanism

How it works.

Safety & regulatory boundary

The consequential part.

Not approved anywhere and not in clinical development for muscle building. Prohibited in sport as an anabolic agent. The published liver-injury literature is the central fact of this memo: at least two independent case reports name RAD-140 specifically, and a broader analysis of roughly 20 suspected SARM-related cases since 2020 treats this as a class-level signal. Sold as a research chemical with unverified identity and purity.

What's next

What we're watching.

Any registered human trial, further case surveillance, and analytical testing of the products actually on sale.

Context

Why this is discussed.

It is marketed as the strongest SARM for muscle gain and is easy to buy, which is precisely the combination that produces the case reports below.

The evidence base

5 cited references.

Regulatory & labels1

The 2026 prohibited list

World Anti-Doping Agency · Effective 2026-01-01

Keep reading

Related published memos.