The verdict
Our read at a glance.
Whether a selective androgen receptor modulator that reliably adds lean body mass also improves what people can actually do.
- The signal
- The POWER 1 and POWER 2 phase 3 trials each enrolled roughly 325 patients with stage III or IV non-small cell lung cancer alongside first-line chemotherapy. Enobosarm showed a consistent effect on lean body mass against placebo at all assessment times. It failed the overall criteria for the co-primary responder endpoints: stair climb power did not separate from placebo at day 84. That combination, real mass without demonstrated function, is the most useful finding on this page.
- The unknown
- Whether any population gets a functional benefit, and whether the lean-mass effect translates to strength or performance in healthy trained people, which has never been the subject of a comparable trial. The mass-versus-function gap is unresolved rather than answered.
- Our read
- The most instructive SARM memo, because it is the one that did the work. Two properly powered phase 3 trials, a consistent effect on lean body mass, and no demonstrated improvement in what patients could do. Anyone arguing that SARMs are validated should read the endpoint that failed, not the one that passed.
The mechanism
How it works.
Safety & regulatory boundary
The consequential part.
Not approved for any indication. Prohibited in sport as an anabolic agent. Published case reports describe ostarine-associated drug-induced liver injury in people using it as a bodybuilding product, and broader analyses of suspected SARM-related liver injury cases place this in a class-level pattern rather than treating it as a one-off. Product sold under this name is a research chemical of unverified identity.
What's next
What we're watching.
Any trial powered on function rather than mass, any regulatory filing, and continued case surveillance for liver injury.
Context
Why this is discussed.
It is the most-purchased SARM in fitness communities and the one with the strongest claim to legitimacy, because unlike the rest it genuinely reached phase 3 with FDA fast track designation.
The evidence base
7 cited references.
Regulatory & labels1
World Anti-Doping Agency · Effective 2026-01-01
Indexed literature (PubMed)5
Crawford J, Prado CM, Johnston MA, Gralla RJ, Taylor RP, Hancock ML, Dalton JT (Curr Oncol Rep) · 2016
Srinath R, Dobs A (Future Oncol) · 2014
Weinblatt D, Roy S (J Med Cases) · 2022
Leciejewska N, et al. (Eur J Clin Pharmacol) · 2024
Nash E, et al. (Aliment Pharmacol Ther) · 2024
Sponsor & other sources1
GTx Inc (company announcement, SEC exhibit) · 2013
Keep reading