Evidence memo / Anabolic androgens & PEDs

Ostarine (enobosarm)

Also: MK-2866 · GTx-024 · S-22 · enobosarm

The SARM that went furthest in real clinical development, ran two phase 3 trials in cancer-related muscle wasting, and missed its co-primary endpoints because added lean mass did not translate into better physical function.

Controlled human dataPhase 2 / Phase 3Safety / regulatory watch

The verdict

Our read at a glance.

Whether a selective androgen receptor modulator that reliably adds lean body mass also improves what people can actually do.

The signal
The POWER 1 and POWER 2 phase 3 trials each enrolled roughly 325 patients with stage III or IV non-small cell lung cancer alongside first-line chemotherapy. Enobosarm showed a consistent effect on lean body mass against placebo at all assessment times. It failed the overall criteria for the co-primary responder endpoints: stair climb power did not separate from placebo at day 84. That combination, real mass without demonstrated function, is the most useful finding on this page.
The unknown
Whether any population gets a functional benefit, and whether the lean-mass effect translates to strength or performance in healthy trained people, which has never been the subject of a comparable trial. The mass-versus-function gap is unresolved rather than answered.
Our read
The most instructive SARM memo, because it is the one that did the work. Two properly powered phase 3 trials, a consistent effect on lean body mass, and no demonstrated improvement in what patients could do. Anyone arguing that SARMs are validated should read the endpoint that failed, not the one that passed.

The mechanism

How it works.

Safety & regulatory boundary

The consequential part.

Not approved for any indication. Prohibited in sport as an anabolic agent. Published case reports describe ostarine-associated drug-induced liver injury in people using it as a bodybuilding product, and broader analyses of suspected SARM-related liver injury cases place this in a class-level pattern rather than treating it as a one-off. Product sold under this name is a research chemical of unverified identity.

What's next

What we're watching.

Any trial powered on function rather than mass, any regulatory filing, and continued case surveillance for liver injury.

Context

Why this is discussed.

It is the most-purchased SARM in fitness communities and the one with the strongest claim to legitimacy, because unlike the rest it genuinely reached phase 3 with FDA fast track designation.

The evidence base

7 cited references.

Regulatory & labels1

The 2026 prohibited list

World Anti-Doping Agency · Effective 2026-01-01

Keep reading

Related published memos.